04.23.09

Updated: Reaction to: “How to Correctly Explain the Architectural Differences Between Hyper-V and ESX”

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , at 12:10 PM by Ken Cline

Oh, goodness! It seems that Greg Shields’ attempt at “How to Correctly Explain the Architectural Differences Between Hyper-V and ESX” isn’t all that correct. Oh, he starts out pretty well, classifying both Hyper-V and ESX as Type-1 hypervisors, which is correct. Where he goes astray is when he claims that Hyper-V utilizes “paravirtualization” and ESX relies on “hardware emulation” – wrong! Read the rest of this entry »

04.20.09

The Great vSwitch Debate – Part 6

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , , , , at 5:39 PM by Ken Cline

OK, so the count is up to five posts on vSwitches. If you’ve not read these posts, I recommend that you go back and do so now. The first five posts were:

Now, in Part 6, we finally start talking about host configurations! I started a thread over on the VMTN Community forums for people to provide input about content they would like to see in this series. VMTN user RobVM asked about a configuration with eight pNICs and iSCSI connectivity, so I’ll tackle that first. But before we do, let me lay some ground rules: Read the rest of this entry »

04.17.09

The Great vSwitch Debate – Part 5

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , , , at 10:35 AM by Ken Cline

So far, we’ve been through four posts on vSwitches. If you’ve not read these posts, I recommend that you go back and do so now (or you can read this post and then go back – there are not many dependencies). The first four posts were:

Now, in Part 5, I’m going to identify the various “networks” that you interact with in a VMware environment and also provide my recommendation for a configuration with only two pNICs. On with the show! Read the rest of this entry »

04.10.09

The Great vSwitch Debate – Part 4

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , , at 1:05 PM by Ken Cline

OK, we’re now up to Part 4 in this series of articles. With a title like “The Great vSwitch Debate” I bet you’re wondering when the debate’s going to start – well, not yet. I’ve still got a few more details to cover about what makes a vSwitch tick before I can really get into the discussion of what’s the best way to configure your vSwitches.

So far, we’ve been through three posts on vSwitches. If you’ve not read these posts, I recommend that you go back and do so now (or you can read this post and then go back – there are not many dependencies). The first three posts were:

So, what does that leave for Part 4? Plenty! In this edition, we’re going to talk about how a vSwitch detects path failures and also dip our toes into the Cisco Discovery Protocol waters. Now, on to the next topic! Read the rest of this entry »

04.06.09

HyTrust Appliance

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , , , , at 12:02 AM by Ken Cline

I had the pleasure of having Eric Chiu and Ken Crandall of HyTrust (http://www.linkedin.com/companies/hytrust & http://www.hytrust.com/) give me a pre-release demo of their soon to be released product, the HyTrust Appliance. I hesitate to call the device a “security appliance”, although it is – and much more. My take on the HyTrust Appliance is that it is a device (either a physical hardware appliance or a VM appliance) whose goal, at a high level, is to provide a centralized point for administrative access to your VMware Infrastructure components. Why would you want such a thing? Here are four good reasons: Read the rest of this entry »

04.05.09

The Great vSwitch Debate – Part 3

Posted in LinkedIn, Virtualization tagged , , at 4:42 PM by Ken Cline

OK…in Part 1 of this series, we introduced the concept of a vSwitch and touched on some of the options available. In Part 2, we talked about some of the security features available in the vSwitch. In this Part 3, we’re going to talk about the load balancing features that are available in the vSwitch.

In a vSwitch, load balancing policies describe the different techniques that will be used for distributing the network traffic from all the virtual machines that are connected to the vSwitch and its subordinate Port Groups across the physical NICs associated with the vSwitch. There are several options available for load balancing as shown below: